Mario Godoy requests to archive the impeachment trial against him and denies responsibilities in the accusations made by correísmo
Mario Godoy, president of the Judiciary Council of Ecuador, has requested the National Assembly's Oversight Committee to dismiss the impeachment trial against him, initiated by members of the correísmo movement over allegations of failing to fulfill his duties.
Mario Godoy, the president of Ecuador's Judiciary Council (CJ), has formally requested the National Assembly's Oversight Committee to archive the impeachment trial initiated against him by five members of the correísmo faction, represented in the Ciudadana Revolution (RC) bloc. The accusations against him involve alleged failures in fulfilling his duties, including accusations of interference in judicial processes, a purported conflict of interest, neglect in protecting judges, and institutional cover-up related to Henry Gaibor. Godoy has publicly denied these charges and stated his commitment to transparency and accountability within the judiciary.
The accusations detail several specific instances where Godoy is alleged to have improperly influenced judicial matters. One notable instance involves claims of undue pressure placed on judge Nubia Vera during a legal action taken by former Vice President Verónica Abad. Additionally, there are allegations that Godoy allowed interference by Henry Gaibor, the provincial director of Pichincha, in a criminal case regarding money laundering involving a figure named Jezdimir Srdan. These claims highlight the tensions between different political factions in Ecuador and the challenges facing the judiciary in maintaining independence.
This situation underscores the ongoing struggles within Ecuadorian politics, particularly regarding the judiciary's autonomy amid political pressures. By requesting the impeachment trial's dismissal, Godoy aims to clear his name and reinforce the Judiciary Council's integrity. However, the process also raises significant questions about the accountability of public officials and the potential politicization of judicial matters, especially in a country where political conflicts often intersect with the judicial system.