The article examines the implications of overregulation, asserting that by imposing excessive rules, individuals relinquish their ability to think critically or independently. This phenomenon is occurring across multiple sectors, including politics, the economy, and even football, where the desire for simplification can lead to inefficiencies.

A recent example cited in the article is the German government's implementation of a new "right to repair" initiative aligned with EU directives, allowing consumers to have their electronic devices, such as smartphones, repaired for up to seven years. While on the surface this appears beneficial by providing consumers with more options, the article points out that consumers have already been able to have certain smartphones repaired without the need for such legislation. This highlights a disconnect between regulatory intentions and the reality of consumer behavior.

Ultimately, the article argues that despite the implementation of regulations like the right to repair, there is a notable reluctance among consumers to choose repairable devices, casting doubt on the effectiveness of such policies. This suggests that overregulation not only complicates choices but also reflects a deeper need for consumers to take greater responsibility in making informed decisions about their purchases, rather than relying on authorities to dictate terms for them.