The piece discusses the problematic nature of journalism's critique, particularly focusing on the phenomenon of harsh criticism, or "stroncatura," which is marked by a disregard for respect and decorum in writing. It suggests that such critique deviates from the core principles of journalism, which emphasize respectfulness and essential reporting. Instead, these harsh judgments tend to be exaggerated, indecorous, and unworthy of the profession itself, indicating a troubling trend where the boundaries of journalism are inadequately maintained.

Furthermore, the author asserts that the art of harsh criticism should not be confused with constructive critique. Using a metaphor, the piece compares the ineffective harsh critique to a poor performance of sophisticated material, contrasting the artistic integrity that should underlie genuine criticism with the ineptitudes of damaging, reckless commentary. This distinction emphasizes the confusion that often arises in public discourse, where fervent criticism may overshadow constructive dialogue.

Ultimately, the article argues that such criticism reflects a societal failure in upholding the principles and responsibilities of journalism. It challenges readers to recognize the implications of unrestrained judgment and calls for a return to a more respectful and disciplined approach to media criticism, where ethics guide the behavior of journalists, strengthening the profession rather than undermining it.