COGNICURRENT

In a significant shift, President Trump's recent actions regarding Iran have left many of his supporters shocked and increasingly impatient with his administration.

A legal expert argues that unilateral military attacks undermine the trust in the international legal system.

Hezbollah's Mahmoud Qamati outlines the party's position regarding military intervention in support of Iran, emphasizing that the decision will depend on the situation and Lebanon's stability.

Iran's weakened regime may endure the current offensive, yet it will struggle to exert the same influence over its neighbors as before.

The article discusses the complicity of Japan and European nations in U.S. military interventions while highlighting international criticism from Islamic nations.

Political researcher Timo R. Stewart asserts that the strikes initiated by the USA and Israel against Iran are unequivocally in violation of international law.

A new Reuters/Ipsos poll reveals only 27% of Americans approve of US military actions in Iran, reflecting a divided public opinion.

The article critiques Donald Trump's foreign policy decisions, particularly in relation to military intervention in the Middle East, which has caused division within his MAGA movement.

In the aftermath of recent attacks in Iran, public sentiment has polarized, with some citizens expressing relief and even joy, believing that only a military intervention can topple the regime.

The American media has a divided response to President Trump's military strike on Iran, with conservatives largely supportive while liberals criticize it as a reckless exercise of power.

The Jewish community is experiencing a mix of anxiety and hope regarding military intervention in Iran, fearing reprisals and increased security threats.

Iranian dissidents in Italy rally for intervention and express their desire for a free and democratic Iran, following military actions and organized protests.

The article discusses the complexities of U.S. foreign policy under Donald Trump, particularly regarding Iran and Venezuela, highlighting the potential political motivations behind military intervention.

Kamala Harris criticizes Donald Trump's stance on military interventions, particularly emphasizing the dangers of a potential conflict with Iran.

The article discusses the recent military actions of the United States against Iran, highlighting America's historical military interventions and its complexities.

The article discusses President Trump's military actions against Iran, arguing that they may significantly impact both the upcoming midterm elections and his legacy.

Following a major attack by the US and Israel on Iran resulting in the death of Supreme Leader Khamenei, Republican leaders have praised the action while public opinion in the US remains skeptical about the military intervention.

The article discusses a British diplomat's perspective on the U.S. military approach towards Iran, highlighting the implications of U.S. historical actions and its failure to engage in genuine negotiations.

John Bolton expresses deep concerns regarding the potential for attacks on Europe and the USA, particularly emphasizing Italy's vulnerability.

Within Trump's MAGA movement, some figures are expressing opposition to potential military conflict with Iran, marking a shift in their stance from previous support for military interventions.

A coordinated attack by the US and Israel on Iran raises fears of regional instability and a spike in oil prices, reflecting the chaos of past military interventions.

The article discusses the inconsistency in Trump's stance on military intervention, highlighting his shift from criticizing the Iraq War to advocating for aggressive policies against Iran without clear justification.

An editorial by the New York Times questions President Trump’s initiation of military action against Iran, highlighting his campaign promise to end wars rather than start new ones.

Prominent Democrats express their criticism of the US and Israel's military actions against Iran amidst calls for Congressional approval before any military intervention.

George Conway labeled the U.S. a 'terrorist state' following joint military strikes with Israel against Iran, raising concerns over U.S. foreign intervention.

This article discusses recent tensions in the Middle East, including military actions and responses involving Israel, Iran, and the U.S.

An Iranian analyst argues that military strikes alone cannot overthrow regimes, citing the resilience of Iran against US and Israeli attacks as a form of victory.

Former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa is set to visit Venezuela again, asserting that nothing has changed since the U.S. military operation that captured President Nicolás Maduro.

The article discusses President Trump's military intervention against Iran and his motivations to leave a legacy as a historic interventionist leader.

Trump has launched a military strike against Iran without Congressional approval or public backing, reigniting concerns over unchecked presidential war powers.

Andreas Kaju, a US expert, suggests that broader military engagement by the United States in Iran is unlikely due to insufficient military resources to replace the regime.

Reza Pahlavi, an Iranian opposition leader, described the U.S.-Israeli military strikes in Iran as a 'humanitarian intervention' aimed at supporting the Iranian people's struggle against the Islamic Republic regime.

An editorial in the New York Times criticizes President Trump for launching a military attack on Iran, contradicting his 2024 campaign promises to end wars.

Reza Pahlavi, the exiled heir to the overthrown Iranian Shah, has urged Iranian military forces to oppose Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and expressed support for U.S. humanitarian intervention in Iran.

'The time to return to the streets is near,' declares Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, following recent U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iranian cities.

President Trump claims that Iran has resumed its nuclear program and has enough nuclear material to build a bomb, a claim considered not credible by experts and supported by The New York Times analysis.

Trump's advisers are under pressure to support military intervention in Iran, amid conflicting claims about the threat Iran poses to the US.

Donald Trump states that a military intervention in Iran is still being considered as talks between the US and Iran show no progress and tensions remain high.

The U.S. Department of Defense is escalating tensions with AI company Anthropic over the military use of its technology, warning of potential intervention if demands are not met.

In Mocache, Ecuador, three farmers were kidnapped and their agricultural machinery stolen, prompting a swift military and police rescue operation.

U.S. President Donald Trump is considering military intervention in Iran, with options presented by military officials suggesting Israel's potential leading role in the attack.

The Mexican Senate has paused the authorization for the entry of US troops into Mexican territory following the recent capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and military intervention in Venezuela.

Fyodor Lukyanov discusses how Russia's military operation in Ukraine represents a significant change in global political dynamics, challenging the notion that force is an illegitimate means of resolving disputes.

Democratic leaders expressed concern over the Trump administration's opaque decision-making regarding potential military action in Iran, urging transparency about any intentions.

Exiled Iranian crown prince Reza Pahlavi advocates for U.S. military intervention in Iran to help facilitate a regime change.

Iran has indicated that a military intervention by the US would lead to a 'devastating war,' while both sides continue negotiations in Geneva regarding Iran's nuclear program.

There is increasing debate in Washington regarding the best military approach to deal with Tehran, focusing on the costs of any military action rather than just options for intervention.

American officials reportedly prefer that Israel attacks Iran before the United States considers military action.

Active-duty military personnel in Ecuador have called on the Constitutional Court to intervene and allow their participation in the discussion regarding a social security law for the Armed Forces.

A Hezbollah source stated that the militant group will refrain from military intervention should there be a limited American strike against Iran, although an attack on Iran's Supreme Leader would be considered a 'red line.'