A 'Lie' of a 5-Year-Old Son, Father Spent 23 Years in Jail... Accused of 4 Murders
In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court acquitted a man who spent 23 years in prison for allegedly murdering his wife and three children, after determining that the prosecution failed to prove its case against him.
Ministry of the Interior implements protection protocols for judge in the Goleada case
The Ecuadorian Ministry of the Interior has updated the risk analysis for Judge Jairo García, activating necessary protection protocols due to threats related to the Goleada case.
VIDEOS: Good Morning PE, Thursday, February 26, 2026
A report on various news including sexual abuse allegations against a judge in Brazil, ongoing heavy rain in Minas Gerais, a murder case in São Paulo, and significant political revelations regarding economic forums and nuclear discussions with Iran.
The 'reasonable doubt' of those who acquitted Stasi: 'Sempio innocent until proven otherwise'
A new book examines the controversial Garlasco murder case, particularly focusing on the acquittal and subsequent conviction of Alberto Stasi, and suggests the narrative around his innocence is still alive among some.
Who does President Karol Nawrocki want to pardon? "Rzeczpospolita"'s findings, the president's reaction
President Karol Nawrocki has requested case files of four convicted individuals, prompting discussions about the presidential pardon process in Poland.
Cousin accuses judge Magid Nauef Láuar of sexual abuse: 'There was an attempt at the act itself and I managed to get away'
A Brazilian judge has reversed his previous decision to absolve a man living with a 12-year-old girl and has ordered their arrest after reflecting more deeply on the case.
Justice cannot bypass process to correct error, says prosecutor about case of man who was acquitted of raping girl in MG
A prosecutor in Minas Gerais criticized a judicial decision that reversed an acquittal of a man convicted of raping a minor, arguing it poses a legal dilemma.
The Malvinas Case: Committee to Present Extension Resource to Clarify Compliance with Reparation Measures
The Permanent Committee for the Defense of Human Rights in Ecuador plans to monitor and push for compliance with the court's reparations ruling concerning the Malvinas case involving the forced disappearance of four children.
Cousin of judge who acquitted defendant of rape files complaint and claims magistrate asked him to stay silent: 'it was a joke'
Saulo Láuar has filed a complaint against his cousin, Judge Magid Nauef Láuar, alleging past abuse and claiming the judge instructed him to remain silent about past incidents following a controversial acquittal.
Many contradictions in the 'confession', pointed out by negative film: Hino Town case 'posthumous retrial'
The Hino Town case from 1984, regarded as the second posthumous retrial of a murder case in post-war Japan, highlights inconsistencies in the confession of the accused, Hiroshi Sakuhara, leading to new evaluations of the evidence.
Marek Domagalski: Let’s not waste judicial power
The article discusses a legal case in Poland where a party seeks to renew proceedings based on a recent constitutional ruling that impacts the ability to appeal court decisions regarding judicial fees.
The Bride's Father: 'I Confessed for You' - Hino Town Incident, the Door to a Posthumous Review
The Supreme Court of Japan has decided to begin a retrial in the Hino Town Incident case, where Hiroshi Sakohara was sentenced to life in prison for the murder and robbery of a liquor store owner in 1984, based on a confession he claimed he made for the sake of his daughter.
What kind of incident was the Hino Town incident and what were the decisive factors for the retrial? Five key points explained
The Hino Town incident, a murder case from 1984, is set for a retrial after new evidence surfaced, raising questions about the initial conviction and the lengthy judicial process.
Dalmasso Case. Accusation Presented Against Three Prosecutors, Starting an Unprecedented Process
In a groundbreaking case in Córdoba, Argentina, three prosecutors are being accused in connection with the femicide of Nora Dalmasso, with a court decision expected by May 28.
Petroamazonas requests anti-corruption judge Carlos Serrano to excuse himself from the trial tribunal in the Triple A case; request seeks to avoid delays and annulments
Petroamazonas has requested that anti-corruption judge Carlos Serrano recuse himself from the Triple A trial tribunal in order to prevent potential legal delays and invalidation issues.
Nisman Case: Former Prosecutor Viviana Fein Declares and Says She Will 'Never' Admit Fault for Irregularities in the Investigation
Former prosecutor Viviana Fein described the investigation into Alberto Nisman’s death as a 'failure' and asserted she will not take responsibility for alleged irregularities.
Metastasis Case: Judge Orders Seizure of 50% of Two Houses Owned by Daniel Salcedo and Attorney General Reports Non-Payment by Leandro Norero's Right-Hand Man
A judge in Ecuador has ordered the seizure of 50% of two houses belonging to Daniel Salcedo due to his failure to comply with financial penalties imposed in the 'Metastasis' corruption case.
Lawsuit Against Former Deputy Accused of Kidnapping Journalist Moves to Second Instance by Decision of TJRR
The case against former Deputy Jalser Renier, accused of kidnapping and torturing journalist Romano dos Anjos, has been elevated to the second judicial instance in Brazil following a unanimous decision by the TJRR judges.
Federal Court acquits Léo Lins in case that sentenced him to 8 years in prison for prejudiced jokes
The Federal Court acquitted comedian Léo Lins, previously sentenced to over eight years for making discriminatory jokes during a comedy show.
After a year, city hall tries to recover 2.1 million lost in scam; case is under secrecy
A year after a scam causing the wrongful transfer of R$ 2.1 million from the Pirassununga city hall, the case remains under judicial secrecy as investigations continue.
Witness saw Margrét Löf violently attack her mother shortly before she murdered her father
Sigurbjörn Bárðarson attests to witnessing Margrét Halla Hansdóttir Löf perpetrate violence against her mother just days before she killed her father, with the case currently under national scrutiny.
Judge Carlos Mahiques resigned from the chamber of the Casation that will define the case of the fifth of Pilar linked to the AFA
Judge Carlos Mahiques has resigned from his temporary position in the Federal Chamber of Penal Cassation due to functional circumstances, just after celebrating his birthday at a property linked to a controversial AFA official.
Adif obtained judicial permission to reconstruct the area of the accident in Adamuz, but the judge criticizes them for 'extracting material of interest for the case'
Adif received judicial permission to reconstruct the site of a railway accident in Adamuz, but a judge criticized their actions regarding the extraction of potentially relevant evidence.
Judges Struggle with Complex Court Cases and Labor Shortages
Judges in Estonia are facing challenges with increasing case complexities and a shortage of judicial staff, leading to prolonged court proceedings.
US judge blocks release of report on Trump classified documents case
A federal judge has ruled that a report on former President Trump's handling of classified documents cannot be released to the public by the Department of Justice.
Judicial Family, Political Friction, and Controversies: Carlos Mahiques, One of the Judges Who Must Decide the Fate of the Case Linked to the AFA
Carlos Mahiques, a prominent judge in Argentina, is involved in a significant legal case regarding the ownership of a luxurious property attributed to AFA authorities.
AFAgate: a judge celebrated his birthday in the estate attributed to Toviggino, and now he must resolve in that case
A judge involved in the AFAgate investigation celebrated his birthday at a property linked to the case he is now examining.
The man who has made calling someone 'monkey' and 'black piece of shit' a hate crime in the Supreme Court talks about racism and the 'Vinicius Jr. case'
A significant judicial victory in Spain has categorized derogatory terms like 'monkey' and 'black piece of shit' as hate crimes, spearheaded by a case brought forth by Manu, a 70-year-old who stood against racism.
Judgment of Rebellion by Chief Judge Ji Gwi-yeon... Differed from Judges Lee Jin-kwan and Ryu Kyung-jin
The judgment by Chief Judge Ji Gwi-yeon in the rebellion case reveals differing interpretations among various judicial panels regarding the involvement of key figures.
Chronology of the 'Noelia' case | The judicial journey exhausts the instances in Spain
The 'Noelia' case has reached a critical point in Spain as a young woman with paralysis awaits euthanasia amid legal challenges from her father.
Zlatica Kušnírová: I would like to talk to Fico. I feel immense anger
Zlatica Kušnírová expresses her frustrations and fears regarding the ongoing judicial processes surrounding her daughter's murder case, feeling disillusioned with the current government and judicial system.
The abortion case in Oleśnica. Małgorzata Manowska vs. the prosecutor's office. The court's decision is here
The article discusses a high-profile abortion case involving a woman who sought to terminate her late-term pregnancy due to health concerns, leading to legal implications involving judicial authority and prosecutorial decisions in Poland.
Choi Sang-mok, accused of perjury, applies for disqualification of Judge Jin-kwan Lee overseeing Han Deok-soo's sentencing
Choi Sang-mok, a former economic deputy prime minister indicted for perjury, has requested the disqualification of Judge Jin-kwan Lee, expressing concerns over the fairness of the trial regarding Han Deok-soo's case.
The Lies of Cristina Kirchner and Her Lawyer
The article discusses the defense strategy employed by Cristina Kirchner's lawyer, focusing on repeated falsehoods despite prior judicial rulings.
The Audios of Karina: Judicial Setback for Deputy Pagano and Her Husband in a Government Complaint
Deputy Marcela Pagano and her husband Franco Bindi faced a judicial setback as their request to access documents in a government espionage case against Karina Milei was denied.
Enrichment and money laundering: a setback for Insaurralde in his attempt to use a decree from Milei to avoid investigation by the UIF
Former mayor Martín Insaurralde received a judicial setback in his case involving alleged illicit enrichment and money laundering after a court rejected his attempt to remove the Financial Information Unit from his case.
Indore MBA Student Murder Case: Accused Sent to Judicial Remand
The accused in the Indore MBA student murder case has been presented before the court and sent to judicial remand for three days, with the possibility of extension.
Defense of Aquiles Alvarez requests that the judge's recommendation for transfer to prison 4 in Quito be considered
Aquiles Alvarez's defense attorney has requested the transfer of Alvarez and four other defendants to prison 4 in Quito after a judge's recommendation following the issuance of preventive detention.
Judges and Prosecutors Union: 'Political Tomb Robbery and Utter Opportunism on the Trial of Tempi'
The Judges and Prosecutors Union of Greece condemned unnamed politicians for undermining the upcoming trial related to the Tempi incident, labeling their actions as desperate opportunism.
Case Nery: STJ decrees new arrest of PMs suspected of forging confrontation in lawyer's death case
The Superior Court of Justice in Brazil has ordered the preventive detention of several military police officers suspected of fabricating a confrontation linked to the murder of lawyer Renato Nery.
Alleged pressures on Judge Carlos Serrano are at the center of the accusation against Mario Godoy in the political trial to be resolved in the Assembly
Mario Godoy is facing a political trial in Ecuador for alleged undue pressures on Judge Carlos Serrano regarding a money laundering case.
Crans-Montana, the bodyguard: 'Jessica told us to keep the security doors closed'
A bodyguard from Crans-Montana has revealed that Jessica instructed them to keep security doors shut, amidst rising criticisms directed at the prosecutors regarding their handling of the case.
They asked for a federal judge accused of threatening and harassing court employees to go to trial
Federal prosecutors in La Pampa have requested that Judge Pablo Díaz Lacava be tried for threats and workplace harassment against court staff in a case involving gender-based violence.
BBC: Wrong person in prison for 23 years for the murder of a student? The false testimonies and the videos that 'vanished'
A BBC Panorama investigation raises serious questions about judicial errors and deliberate evidence tampering in the case of Omar Bengit, who has spent 23 years in prison for the 2002 murder of South Korean student Jeong Ok-sin in Bournemouth.
Sudan: EU Envoy Warns of 'Dangerous Regression' After Women Sentenced to Death By Stoning in Sudan
The EU envoy to Sudan has raised alarms regarding a recent case where two women were sentenced to death by stoning, warning of a troubling regression in human rights and judicial standards in the country.
The judicial battle of Iberdrola against Red Eléctrica regarding the blackout is reactivated
Iberdrola's legal case against Red Eléctrica has been revived as a Madrid court accepts its unfair competition lawsuit related to a major blackout incident.
State Attorney General demands review of case for the release of the crematorium owner in Chihuahua
The State Attorney General of Mexico demands an immediate review of a federal judge's decision that led to the release of José Luis A.C., the owner of a crematorium in Chihuahua.
How does the police case proceed involving the officer who hit a thief in Quilmes?
The judicial situation of a police officer who was involved in a hit-and-run incident with a thief in Quilmes is under review following the thief's condition worsening after the accident.
Fabrice Aidan, Frédéric Chaslin, Daniel Siad... French justice takes hold of the Epstein case by appointing magistrates
French judicial authorities are investigating potential infractions linked to French citizens in connection with the Epstein case.
Garlasco, the attack on Stasi's consultant: 'Surpassed every tolerable limit'
The Garlasco case remains in a state of public stagnation as investigations by the Pavia prosecutor continue amidst minimal information release.