Mar 22 • 14:00 UTC 🇬🇧 UK Guardian

Queensland government ‘opens old wounds’ as police officer criticised after Palm Island riots appointed to Legal Aid board

The Queensland government has faced backlash for appointing a police officer involved in the controversial Palm Island riots to the Legal Aid board, reigniting trauma for the First Nations community.

The Queensland government's recent decision to appoint Darren Robinson, a former police officer involved in the 2004 Palm Island riots, to the Legal Aid Queensland board has sparked significant controversy and backlash among First Nations community leaders. This appointment has been characterized as reopening historical wounds, particularly for those affected by the events surrounding the death in custody of Mulrunji Doomadgee and the subsequent violence that erupted on Palm Island. Aunty Gracelyn Smallwood, a local community elder, expressed her outrage, stating that the decision has revived trauma and sorrow from a time when justice was seemingly denied to the victims involved in those harrowing events.

Community leaders believe that Robinson's role in the riots casts a shadow over his ability to serve fairly on the Legal Aid board, especially for those seeking justice within the legal system. They argue that appointing someone viewed as a 'principal antagonist' undermines the community’s trust and reinforces a narrative of impunity for actions against Indigenous peoples. This move comes in the context of a broader political shift, as the current Liberal National government replaced all members of the Legal Aid board appointed by the previous Labor government, raising further concerns about motivation and governance in handling Indigenous justice issues.

As the backlash grows, questions are raised about how such appointments reflect on the government’s commitment to justice for Indigenous Australians. The controversy highlights the ongoing struggles within the legal system, where previous injustices remain unresolved, and the need for attention to be paid to historical contexts in legal governance. The decision serves not just as a local issue but as a pressing reminder of the broader national conversation surrounding reconciliation and justice for First Nations communities across Australia.

📡 Similar Coverage