The article criticizes the current state of the judicial system, likening it to a sports match where the referee is too close to one of the teams. It argues that judges, like referees, should maintain a clear separation from the parties they are judging to ensure impartiality. In the current setup, the author describes a scenario where judges share similar backgrounds and affiliations with the prosecution, which could undermine the perception of fairness in legal proceedings.

The author suggests that in what are deemed civilized countries, a clear distinction of roles is crucial for a functional justice system. They highlight the analogy of a referee being part of just one team and how this could potentially sway the fairness of the game. The focus is not only on the honesty of judges but also on the necessity for them to appear unbiased to the public, which is essential for maintaining trust in judicial processes.

Ultimately, the piece calls for reforms in the legal system to ensure that judges and other legal professionals have a more balanced and independent stance, akin to the practices in more advanced judicial systems. By aligning the judicial process with the standards of perceived civilized nations, the author advocates for increased impartiality and fairness in the legal system.