The article is a response to Valentina Salerno regarding previous articles published in Il Giornale that questioned the attribution of a bust in Sant'Agnese outside the walls to Michelangelo. The author acknowledges Salerno's engagement in the discussion while emphasizing the importance of a proper scientific methodology in historical analysis, rather than a subjective interpretation. He suggests that claims must align with the highest degree of objectivity to allow others to verify and assess the validity of such assertions.

The author points out that while he is not the only one who has contested the attribution, there has been insufficient discourse on the subject. He critiques the idea of freedom in methodological approaches and insists that a scientific stance should adhere to objective metrics to reach reliable conclusions. The dialogue highlights a broader concern about the accuracy and credibility of art historical research, especially when it involves renowned figures like Michelangelo.

Through this discussion, the article pages into complex issues of attribution in art history, where interpretations can significantly affect the understanding of an artist's body of work. The importance of consensus among historians and critics is underscored, suggesting that misattributions could lead to enduring misconceptions within the art community and beyond, stressing the need for rigorous examination of the evidence before drawing conclusions.