The article from Il Giornale discusses the level of liberalism of a state or supranational organization during crises, highlighting that it's easy to protect individual rights when things are going well, but significantly more challenging when difficulties arise. The context for this reflection is the plan proposed by the International Energy Agency to address the ongoing oil crisis resulting from the conflict in the Middle East, amid Europe's struggles with energy procurement from Russia.

The proposed measures include moving workers to smart working arrangements, despite recent returns to in-office work, and limiting the use of private cars in cities or setting speed limits to 30 km/h, measures that may paradoxically increase fuel consumption. Other suggestions include encouraging public transport use, which might involve raising fare prices, implementing alternate license plate driving days, and promoting 'Sunday walking' reminiscent of measures taken during the 1973 oil crisis. This critique underscores the disparity between policy intentions and practical effectiveness in times of energy crisis.

The article raises important implications about the role of government in ensuring individual freedoms and the practicalities of energy consumption during crises. It questions whether these measures effectively address the underlying issues or merely serve as temporary solutions, reflecting a broader concern about the balance between state intervention and personal autonomy in turbulent times.