Jaime Malamud Goti, a key legal architect of the Trial of the Juntas, reflects on the 1985 convictions of military leaders responsible for severe repression during Argentina's last military dictatorship. He acknowledges the historical significance of these trials which aimed to restore the citizens' rights of the victims. However, he expresses a tempered enthusiasm, indicating that despite the importance of these actions, the judicial process has undergone an interminable drift, which reveals ongoing challenges in achieving justice.

Malamud Goti contends that the punishments meted out to the military leaders served a crucial deterrent function, contributing to the eventual cessation of military coups in Argentina. He points out that these trials initiated by President Raúl Alfonsín's government are often seen as a proud moment for the democracy that emerged after decades of authoritarian rule. Yet, he underscores that the legacy of these trials is mixed, as the ongoing legal battles and the complexity of societal reconciliation continue to overshadow the initial triumphs.

Despite these challenges, Malamud Goti maintains that the process of trial and justice for the victims was essential not only for individual justice but also for collective memory and national healing. He believes that acknowledging the past and restoring the civil status of victims is a fundamental step towards consolidating democracy. His reflections highlight the complicated nature of justice in a post-dictatorship society, where the quest for accountability remains fraught with obstacles and ambiguity.