In this opinion piece, Stefano Cappellini argues against a proposed reform that is presented under the guise of ensuring guarantees within the legal system. He raises concerns about the integrity of a government that he terms as composed of 'illiberals' and 'judicialists,' suggesting that such a government, with a track record of rule-bending, cannot be trusted to uphold genuine guarantees of justice. Cappellini believes that accepting this reform would not only undermine democratic values but would essentially provide a facade of legitimacy to a governing body that perverts those very principles.

He elaborates on the risks associated with allowing this reform to pass, indicating that it could lead to a further erosion of civil liberties and judicial independence. According to Cappellini, the proposal disguises an underlying agenda that favors a punitive approach rather than a rehabilitative or equitable system. This duality in the government's approach raises alarms about their motivations, especially in light of past actions that have showcased a preference for authoritarian measures.

Ultimately, Cappellini’s stance is a call to action for readers to reject this reform. He emphasizes that accepting such changes not only legitimizes the actions of a government that does not fundamentally respect the rights of its citizens but could also set a dangerous precedent for future legislative initiatives. Thus, he argues for a collective refusal to endorse any reforms that could be misconstrued as supportive of justice but are actually veiled attempts to consolidate power.