The article examines the state of policy discussions within the European Union, expressing frustration over its inability to facilitate effective solutions to pressing issues. The author argues that ideal policy debates should combine informed discourse and diverse perspectives, yet the EU is criticized for failing to achieve this due to bureaucratic hindrances. It suggests that the political climate in the EU has become dysfunctional, characterized by a lack of transparency and a focus on personal agendas rather than collective problem-solving.

It specifically highlights how the EU's policy-making process is mired in secrecy and backroom dealings, which undermine public trust and the potential for meaningful dialogue. The author implies that these obstinate practices have resulted in a stifling environment for innovation and progressive ideas, as politicians often prioritize their own interests over the common good. This critique is aimed at exposing the ironic nature of the EU governance model, where the expectation of collaborative governance is not reflected in practice.

The implications of this critique are significant, as it calls for a reevaluation of how policy debates are conducted in the EU and challenges the institution to restore credibility. If the EU wants to regain its standing and effectiveness on the world stage, including in relations with influential leaders like Putin, it must reform its internal processes to encourage open dialogue and transparency. The article thus serves as a provocative commentary on the current political landscape, urging significant changes to avoid further diminishing the EU's role in international affairs.