Dainius Žalimas raises concerns regarding the constitutionality of the last two Lithuanian governments, claiming that their formation may not have adhered to constitutional law. He argues that the legitimacy of appointing a Prime Minister or other ministers may have been compromised due to procedural violations during the formation of the government. This situation is underpinned by a recent decision from the Constitutional Court, which annulled proceedings that questioned the legality of governmental appointments made through presidential decrees without full ministerial composition.

The article critically examines how these governance issues could potentially undermine public trust in the state apparatus. Žalimas emphasizes that this matter needs clarity and resolution from the Constitutional Court, which is the appropriate authority to determine the legality of the government's formation. The author conveys that the procedure used to appoint ministers—especially when not all positions were filled at the outset—could lead to challenges that affect the functioning and credibility of the governing body.

Ultimately, the implications of these constitutional inquiries extend beyond immediate legal ramifications, as they touch upon broader themes of democratic legitimacy and accountability within Lithuania's political framework. If proven valid, the claims against the government's formation could pave the way for significant political repercussions and potentially a reevaluation of governmental legitimacy in the eyes of the electorate, thereby impacting future governance in Lithuania.