In the article published by Il Giornale, the author reflects on the evolving sentiment surrounding the solidarity movement that arose after the Charlie Hebdo attack in France. Initially, in the wake of the tragedy, there was a widespread expression of support where people resonated with the slogan 'Je suis Charlie Hebdo.' However, the author argues that this sentiment has diminished over time, as it has become evident that the realities and discussions surrounding terrorism have shifted to be more complex and nuanced, rather than one-dimensional expressions of solidarity.

The piece further explores the introspection that followed such attacks, highlighting the societal fractures and challenges to democracy that were brought to light. The author asserts that these reflections often miss the mark, as there is a tendency to analyze the broader implications and historical contexts rather than confront the immediate threats posed by terrorism. This analytical stance, they imply, has led to a complacency towards terrorism, viewing it through an academic lens rather than as a pressing public safety issue.

Concluding with a critique of the response towards terrorism, the author suggests that there is a disconnect between understanding the causes of such violence and taking decisive action against it. They argue that if such terrorism had been rooted in foreign states or religions, Western responses would have likely been more assertive. The discussion indicates a need for a reevaluation of how societies in Europe engage with the threat of terrorism and the ideological undercurrents that fuel it, while questioning the complicity in maintaining a facade of peace with attackers.