The article highlights the importance of transparency in the judicial process, particularly in the case against Marius Borg Høiby. It emphasizes that media coverage and public access to court proceedings are essential for societal oversight and for the public to comprehend the reasons behind judicial outcomes—why individuals may be convicted or acquitted. This commentary follows arguments made by Svein Tore Bergestuen, who noted the potential improvements in media reporting during the Baneheia case, yet questions why this would warrant less openness in Høiby's trial.

Press organizations have advocated for maximum transparency in the court hearings, asserting that open legal processes allow society to ensure that justice is served appropriately. The article insists that such openness is a fundamental principle that not only serves the public's right to information but also acts as a crucial safeguard against potential abuses within the justice system. The vigilant role of editor-controlled media is deemed essential in maintaining this judicial transparency.

Furthermore, the author suggests that public understanding of judicial proceedings can strengthen democratic values by empowering citizens and enhancing trust in the legal system. Transparency is posited as a pillar for protecting the rights of individuals against possible injustices perpetrated by state institutions. This commentary serves as a call to uphold open trials as a bulwark of civil liberties, reinforcing the notion that scrutiny of the legal process is pivotal for the health of democracy and accountability in governance.