The article from Folha reflects on Brazil's approach to law-making and the common perception that an abundance of laws equates to a strong 'Rule of Law'. The author suggests that while the approval of numerous laws by Congress may seem beneficial, it does not necessarily serve the interests of democracy if these laws do not originate from genuine societal needs. Instead of merely legislating based on imagined scenarios, the article advocates for a more case-based legal approach, reminiscent of English common law, where rules evolve from actual disputes and circumstances rather than hypothetical situations.

The author contrasts modern legislative practices with traditional concepts of law, suggesting that many laws may be created from the legislators' imaginations rather than responding to the realities faced by individuals in society. This disconnect can lead to a proliferation of legislation that does not necessarily reflect the will of the people, undermining the democratic principle that laws should serve the common good. Through this lens, the article encourages a reconsideration of how laws are conceptualized and implemented.

Furthermore, the piece points out the potential dangers of a legal system that prioritizes quantity over quality, highlighting that not every issue warrants a law. The implied argument is that law should be a tool for genuine justice rather than a response to every societal complaint. This thought-provoking perspective raises important questions about legislative responsibility and the effectiveness of laws in enhancing true democracy.