In a recent televised debate on Sky tg24, Italian Minister Nordio expressed hopes for a referendum voter turnout between 50 and 60 percent. He emphasized the need for 'collaboration' if the referendum passes, suggesting that a successful 'yes' vote could lead to a cooperative effort in achieving reform goals. However, he did not shy away from criticism, specifically targeting opposition leader Franceschini, whom he accused of rallying citizens to oppose the referendum without presenting adequate alternatives.

In contrast, Grosso, the president of the 'no' committee, argued against the proposed reform, labeling it as 'blind' and questioning the trustworthiness of the referendum process. He pointedly criticized the random selection method used by the CSM (Superior Council of the Judiciary), calling it humiliating and indicative of larger issues within the Italian judiciary reform discourse. This exchange highlights not only the contentious nature of the current political climate surrounding the referendum but also reflects deeper skepticism about judicial independence and reform in Italy.

The debate illustrates the polarized opinions on the referendum's significance, where proponents view it as a necessary step towards judicial improvement, while opponents fear it undermines established institutions. With the referendum approaching, the discussion has galvanized public interest and raised critical questions about the future of judicial reforms in Italy, emphasizing the split between various political factions and their visions for the country’s legal system.