An op-ed published by Al Jazeera has praised the US-Israel operation against Iran, labeled Operation Epic Fury, presenting a contradictory perspective to prevailing narratives that suggest the campaign is a blunder. The author, Muhanad Seloom, asserts that critics are misjudging the situation by focusing solely on the immediate costs and challenges of the operation, rather than its strategic benefits. Seloom argues that the critics have failed to recognize the potential long-term advantages and objectives of the operation, underscoring the need to assess the situation through a strategic rather than a purely tactical lens.

The op-ed highlights a significant disconnect between the public perception of the operation, characterized by fears of escalation and criticism from media and political figures, and what the author views as a more nuanced understanding of the operation’s objectives. According to Seloom, the negative narratives surrounding the operation, including rising oil prices and regional instability, overlook the fact that the US-Israeli strategy is not merely reactive but part of a broader plan to counter Iranian influence in the Middle East. This argument posits that, despite criticisms, the operational goals of the US and Israel may indeed be being met.

Furthermore, the piece insists that as the operation continues, it may alter the dynamics of power in the region in favor of the US and Israel. Seloom emphasizes the importance of measuring the success of military campaigns not just by immediate outcomes, but by their capacity to reshape geopolitical landscapes. As such, the op-ed serves as a noteworthy counterargument to the prevailing skepticism surrounding Operation Epic Fury, suggesting that a reevaluation of its impacts might be warranted as events unfold.