The Iranian diaspora has completely failed. Performative actions have replaced politics, says historian Araš Azízí
Historian Araš Azízí critiques the Iranian diaspora for its failure in political activism, emphasizing the need for effective strategies beyond performative actions.
In an interview, historian Araš Azízí assessed the shortcomings of the Iranian diaspora in effectively advocating for political change. He argued that while the diaspora has engaged in performative actions to express its identity, these efforts have not translated into meaningful political outcomes. Azízí stressed that the mass protests occurring within and outside Iran do not suffice to dismantle the current regime, particularly one as resilient as Iran's.
The dialogue also explored the implications of Iranian identity in the context of the United States and Canada, pointing to a trend where cultural expressions are prioritized over tangible political engagement. Azízí expressed concerns that this performative aspect could detract from a unified and strategic approach necessary for effecting change. He highlighted the importance of adapting new political strategies that move beyond these limited expressions of identity.
Furthermore, Azízí reflected on the potential for Iran to shift towards a more pragmatic political stance similar to Saudi Arabia's. Such a transformation could open avenues for greater integration into the region. He acknowledged the significant historical moment for Iran, indicating that many anticipate substantial changes in its political direction, governance, and regional relationships, despite the prevailing negative sentiments regarding the political culture that currently exists.