In an opinion piece, Ludvig Köhler reflects on the recent criticisms directed at the Liberal Party, previously known as Folkpartiet, alleging that the party has lost its identity and principles in a bid for relevance. Köhler questions what will remain of the party's historical legacy if the essence of folkpartism is completely erased. The author draws a stark contrast between the classical folkpartist, who embodied a cooler, more collected persona, and the contemporary political climate, which he describes as overly fearful and conformist.

Köhler emphasizes the precarious position of the Liberal Party as it heads into upcoming elections, comparing the act of voting for them to stepping onto unstable ice. This metaphor underscores the uncertainty and potential risks involved in supporting a party perceived to be floundering. He suggests that the party's historical roots and contributions to Swedish society are being neglected in favor of a more opportunistic approach to contemporary politics.

The article ends with a sense of resignation, as Köhler voices the sentiment that perhaps it is time to consider letting go of the movement entirely. By reflecting on the ideological heritage of Folkpartiet, he urges readers to contemplate the significance of preserving political identities and the dangers of historical amnesia in the face of rapid political change.