Mar 16 • 05:49 UTC 🇰🇷 Korea Hankyoreh (KR)

Should We Steal Iran's Enriched Uranium? Trump Faced with a Choice

As the US-Israel-Iran war enters its third week, there is growing interest in whether the US will carry out an operation to seize Iran’s 60% enriched uranium, crucial for preventing nuclear weapon development.

As the conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran continues into its third week, the prospect of a military operation aimed at seizing Iran's 60% enriched uranium is drawing significant attention. This operation is being considered a critical step in the US and Israel's goal of neutralizing what they perceive as a nuclear threat from Iran. However, it is fraught with potential risks and could result in substantial casualties, raising the stakes for any decision made by American leadership. Experts warn that failure to secure the uranium could lead to Iran advancing its nuclear weapons program.

The potential operation has garnered insights from military analysts, including retired Admiral James Stavridis, who indicated that if President Trump were to pursue the seizure of the enriched uranium, it would necessitate one of the largest special operations in history. He highlighted that Iran currently possesses about 440 kg of 60% enriched uranium, which could be further refined to create up to ten nuclear warheads within months. In a video address on the first day of the conflict, President Trump stressed the US's commitment to ensuring that Iran does not acquire nuclear weapons.

However, the logistics of retrieving the enriched uranium present numerous challenges. It would require the deployment of specialized military units, such as Army Rangers, to secure the area, while engineers would need to clear mines and booby traps from the site. Furthermore, temporary airstrips would have to be established for transport aircraft carrying heavy equipment. The Iranian government, through Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, has stated that they are not currently planning to recover the uranium, indicating a preference for international oversight by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for any such actions, which further complicates the operational landscape for the US and its allies.

📡 Similar Coverage