In Finland, the proposed reform by the Criminal Sanctions Agency (Rise) to train more competent prison guards has sparked considerable backlash among corrections officials. The initiative is a response to the alarming situation of security risks posed by a rising inmate population and a shortage of guards. The new training model aims to allow temporary guards to complete qualifications while working, incorporating a significant portion of online education and practical training in prisons.

While the idea of increasing the number of trained guards is ostensibly beneficial for both inmates and staff—potentially reducing lockdown times for prisoners and alleviating pressure on guards—the reforms are coming under fire. A recent investigation by Yle's MOT unit interviewed over twenty former and current employees of Rise, as well as students, uncovering a deep-seated skepticism towards these changes. Critics argue that the reform might not adequately address the core issues within the prison system, including the quality of training and the realities of working conditions.

Moreover, the dissatisfaction among corrections employees indicates a broader concern regarding the management of Finland's penal system. The negative feedback surrounding the proposed reforms highlights the complexities involved in prison reform; addressing staffing shortages is critical, but so is ensuring the safety and well-being of both inmates and correctional staff. As the debate unfolds, the implications of these proposed changes will likely shape the future landscape of Finland’s corrections system and its ability to function effectively and safely.