'Retrial Not Guilty' Lee Kwan-soo, What is the Reason for ‘Investigation Suspension’ at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission? [Goodbye Truth Commission]
The article discusses the transition from the second to the third Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Korea, reflecting on past investigations and the reasons behind the suspension of certain inquiries.
The second Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Korea, which operated for five years, was dissolved last November, making way for a new third commission. This transition is marked by a series called 'Goodbye Truth Commission,' spotlighting the overlooked stories and voices of those committed to historical truth and reconciliation. The new commission will continue the work of examining various human rights violations and violent events that span over a century, from the Korean War to the Anti-Japanese Resistance Movement, even delving into events from as far back as 1894.
In this context, the article features an interview with Choi Jong-gil, a historic researcher who served as a investigator during the second commission. He discusses the reduced scale of investigations as the commission evolved and some the challenges faced, including the suspension of certain inquiries. The second commission handled a smaller number of cases compared to its predecessor, yet managed to validate the truth in several significant events related to independence movements and historical injustices, although at a lower success rate than the first.
The narrative presents a critical analysis of how societal and governmental shifts influence the commission’s scope of investigation, the persistence of historical narratives, and the importance of ongoing efforts to address past wrongs. As the new commission takes shape, there is a sense of urgency and hope that it will build on the lessons learned from its predecessors to ensure that no injustices remain unexamined in the pursuit of truth and reconciliation.