The article reflects on a past debate within a prestigious cultural committee regarding the inclusion of cumbia and other rhythms in iconic venues like the Teatro Colón in Argentina. The author recalls that a unanimous rejection arose from committee members who argued that no genre could be deemed superior to another, highlighting a cultural relativism that complicates the expression of artistic value. This aversion to making definitive judgments stems from a fear of social backlash, indicating a collective struggle within the cultural space to articulate standards of merit.

In the current climate, the author draws parallels between this debate and the reception of contemporary artists such as Bad Bunny. The author critiques the surge of popularity for Bad Bunny, suggesting that the same euphemism of personal taste is being used to deflect politically incorrect critiques against his music and its implications for culture. The discussion moves to a broader examination of how such phenomena are indicative of a societal trend towards a diluted sense of quality in artistic expression, where commercial success is often equated with cultural value.

The piece ultimately raises important questions about the responsibilities of cultural authorities and artistic directors in discerning and promoting high standards of art amidst the pressures of populism and mass appeal. The author contends that the reluctance to engage in critical discussions about artists like Bad Bunny reflects a deeper issue within cultural institutions that prioritize inclusivity over the evaluation of artistic merit, thereby contributing to a perceived decline in cultural standards.