'Mental, subjective impact': Iran taking on 'American might' with cyberterrorism
An analysis of Iran's approach to asserting power through cyberterrorism, highlighting the regime's dependency on the Revolutionary Guards and its struggle for legitimacy.
The article discusses Iran's current political landscape, emphasizing the growing influence of the Revolutionary Guards over the Iranian regime. Farad Khajkvar, a director at the School of Higher Studies, argues that the structure of power in Iran today shows a shift where religion is subordinate to politics, and politics itself is heavily influenced by coercive forces. Furthermore, he suggests that the succession after Khamenei is marked by a lack of institutional legitimacy, with the new leaders appearing weaker and more reliant on their predecessors.
Moreover, the discussion delves into Iran's use of cyberterrorism as a strategy to project power against what it perceives as American might. This method is described not just as an armed threat but as a psychological tactic aimed at disrupting American influence and fostering a sense of resistance among its own populace. By utilizing cyber capabilities, Iran seeks to create a 'mental, subjective impact' that undermines its opponents and strengthens its own narrative.
Lastly, the piece raises concerns about the implications of this shift towards cyber warfare, positing that while Iran's regime may lack broad-based support, its capabilities in the cyber domain could enable it to extend its influence beyond the geopolitical landscape, affecting global norms and security. As observed, the regime's survival hinges on its narratives and the perceived threat it poses, rather than genuine democratic support from its citizens.