Mar 12 • 22:00 UTC 🇯🇵 Japan Asahi Shimbun (JP)

In fact, the world's sea level was one meter higher; is the reason the scientific community's 'vertical divide'?

A study suggests that global sea level rise has been underestimated due to flawed methodologies adopted in the scientific community.

Recent research led by a team from Wageningen University in the Netherlands reveals that the world's coastal sea level has been underestimated by as much as one meter, which may result in climate change impacts being less severe than anticipated. The study published in the British science journal Nature analyzed 385 peer-reviewed papers published between 2009 and 2025, finding that over 90% relied on an outdated method called 'geoid modeling' to determine reference sea levels. This method does not incorporate real-time data on sea currents, water temperatures, and winds, leading to significant discrepancies between model-derived and actual sea levels.

The geoid model calculates the mean sea level based on gravitational forces across different regions of the Earth but fails to account for the variations caused by natural phenomena. Consequently, the researchers noted that nearly all studies analyzed (99%) did not adequately use satellite-derived data to enhance the accuracy of sea level measurements. The implications of this finding are profound, indicating a potential underestimation of the risks posed by rising sea levels due to climate change, which could have far-reaching effects on coastal communities and ecosystems worldwide.

The research points to a need for a paradigm shift in how scientific studies are conducted regarding sea level rise, advocating for integrating satellite measurements with traditional methods. This could lead to a more precise understanding of environmental changes and help policymakers better prepare for future climate challenges, emphasizing the importance of collaboration across scientific disciplines to address such critical global issues.

📡 Similar Coverage