A recent report from Belarusian state television features a Lithuanian woman, Ina Ušakova, who has relocated to Belarus, claiming that in Lithuania, people are not allowed to freely express their opinions or uphold historical traditions. She alleges that there is a systematic suppression of historical memory and that commemorating certain events, such as May 9th, is punished. These statements, lacking concrete evidence, have been utilized by Belarusian propagandists to bolster their narrative that Lithuania restricts freedom of speech and heritage expression.

The report goes on to highlight Ušakova's previous life in Lithuania, which she described as adhering to European standards and values. However, she now regards Belarus as her second homeland, motivated by her personal beliefs, her attitudes toward child upbringing, and her perspective on historical memory. This drastic shift in allegiance raises questions about the influence of propaganda and the extent to which individual narratives are co-opted for political purposes.

Additionally, the Lithuanian military has raised concerns about a resurgence of propaganda efforts aimed at discrediting Lithuania, suggesting that the narrative promoted by Ušakova is part of a larger strategy to paint Lithuania in a negative light. This incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing information warfare in the region, where personal testimonies are used not just as individual accounts but as tools for broader political propaganda.