The proposed electoral reform by President Claudia Sheinbaum's party, Morena, faced rejection in the Mexican Chamber of Deputies, unable to secure the two-thirds majority required for constitutional amendments. This outcome is considered a positive development for the country, as the reform was viewed as a significant step back for democratic plurality. Critics highlighted that the reform lacked essential measures, such as imposing severe penalties on candidates or parties receiving funding from criminal groups, which could undermine electoral integrity.

Furthermore, the reform aimed to weaken Mexico's National Electoral Institute (INE) and promote opacity in electoral financing, rather than achieving real cost savings or efficiency in the electoral process. Measures included reductions in media access, deemed regressive and detrimental to fair competition among candidates and parties. The proposal's failure is attributed not only to the lack of consensus among political forces but also to opposition from its own allies, which significantly undermined its chances of passage.

This rejection reflects a broader challenge within Mexico's political landscape, where the need for a balanced approach and bipartisan agreement is crucial for advancing electoral reforms. It signals a commitment to maintaining democratic norms and pluralism, crucial for the health of Mexico's democracy, indicating that proposals seen as one-sided or coercive can meet substantial resistance, even from potential supporters within the governing coalition.