Israeli security sources have come forward, stating that Israel entered its military operation against Iran without a feasible plan for regime change. The airstrikes were based more on "wishful thinking" about inciting a popular uprising than on actionable intelligence, indicating a significant oversight in the planning stages of the conflict. This revelation adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing military actions, which have now persisted for nearly two weeks, raising questions about their effectiveness and the strategic goals behind them.

As the situation evolves, particularly following the assassination of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, there are growing concerns regarding the future political landscape in Iran. President Trump is now contemplating the implications of continuing the costly military engagement, and whether it has achieved its intended results. Reports suggest that irrespective of immediate military objectives, the long-term outcomes will largely depend on Iran's ability to maintain control over its enriched uranium, which was buried underground during previous US strikes.

The fate of the 440kg of enriched uranium, sufficient to create more than ten nuclear warheads, is emerging as a critical factor in evaluating the war's success. A former Israeli defense official emphasized that how this situation unfolds will serve as a key indicator of whether the military campaign can be deemed effective. If Iran's current leadership retains its power and the uranium remains protected, it may jeopardize regional stability and lead to potential future conflicts, further complicating the already tense geopolitical landscape.