D. Asanavičiūtė-Gružauskienė has formally approached the General Prosecutor's Office regarding A. Gedvilo, based on findings related to his alleged illegal enrichment. The details surfaced from an investigative report highlighted that a company managed by Gedvilo and his then-wife, Jolanta Gedvilienė, controlled two gas stations in Šiauliai, which they sold in 2015 to a company owned by their son, only for those stations to be sold again to another network for a lesser price just the following year. This suggests potential discrepancies in the alleged valuation and profit from these transactions.

Furthermore, it has been indicated that A. Gedvilas, a politician from the Labour Party, was involved in proposing amendments to the Alternative Fuels Act early in the last parliamentary term. His proposals aimed to expand the definition of alternative fuels and extend the deadline for fuel suppliers to provide documentation proving the quality of biofuels. This raises questions about the motivations behind his legislative actions, especially considering his business interests tied to the fuel sector, which could imply a conflict of interest.

Compounding the issue, reports indicate that Gedvilas vehemently opposed legislation that sought to significantly increase Lithuania's commitments regarding the volume of biofuels to be sold in the country. At the same time, his company 'Jozita' is currently embroiled in litigation, which hints at a complicated relationship between his business dealings and his responsibilities as a politician. This case underlines broader concerns about transparency and accountability in Lithuanian politics, and it showcases how business interests can intersect with political actions.