Mar 12 • 06:44 UTC 🇰🇷 Korea Hankyoreh (KR)

On the First Day of the Law Distortion Crime Implementation, Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae and Justice Park Young-jae Reported to Police

On the first day of the implementation of the law against distortion of law, Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae was reported to the police regarding his ruling in President Lee Jae-myung's election law violation case.

The Chief Justice of South Korea, Cho Hee-dae, has been reported to the police for allegedly violating the newly implemented 'law distortion crime' statute, which came into effect on the 12th of this month. This report is linked to Cho's controversial ruling that overturned a previous decision in the election law violation case against President Lee Jae-myung. The case has gained significant attention, given the implications it has for legal accountability among high-ranking judicial figures. The police have assigned the report to the Yongin West Police Station, though it may be reallocated based on further review.

The report was filed by lawyer Lee Byeong-cheol through the National Assembly’s petition platform. Lee accuses Cho of intentionally distorting the legal principles when he issued a ruling that sent the case back to the Seoul High Court with a guilty intent, which happened just days after the Supreme Court accepted the case. The specific nature of the law distortion crime carries penalties of up to 10 years in prison or disqualification from office, highlighting the serious consequence that could arise from judicial misconduct.

During the prior Supreme Court proceedings, a major ruling was made just nine days after the case was accepted for review, leading to claims that such rapid evaluation of approximately 70,000 pages of trial records is implausible. Lawyer Lee emphasized that this kind of decision-making undermines the rights of individuals involved in criminal trials. The unfolding situation raises poignant questions about transparency and accountability in the judiciary, especially concerning the actions of those at the highest levels of the system, as they face scrutiny under the new legal framework introduced to combat judicial malpractice.

📡 Similar Coverage