During the trial of billionaire businessman Frank Stronach, a police officer revealed that investigators were constrained in their ability to probe allegations of sexual assault made against him because of the significant time lapse since the reported incidents. The officer, Sgt. Gabe Di Nardo, faced scrutiny from defence attorney Leora Shemesh regarding the thoroughness of the investigation into the claims made by seven complainants, suggesting potential weaknesses in how the allegations were addressed.

Shemesh pressed Di Nardo on whether the investigation relied on the complainants' accounts without verification of their accuracy. Di Nardo affirmed his belief in the complainants' integrity, stating that he assumes honesty unless given reasons otherwise. However, this approach raised questions about the effectiveness of the investigation, as Shemesh pointed out that merely believing the accusers does not substitute for validating the truth of their statements, especially in light of the years that had elapsed.

The proceedings highlighted the complexities surrounding sexual assault investigations, particularly the limitations law enforcement faces when allegations are made long after the alleged events. This case underscores the challenges of balancing the need to believe survivors while also ensuring that thorough investigative practices are employed, especially when time can complicate evidence gathering and witness reliability.