On March 9, Maria Pevchich took to social media platform X to release excerpts from an official forensic report concerning the autopsy of Alexei Navalny. Pevchich claimed that several media outlets were preparing a sensationalist publication about the results of Navalny's autopsy, which she argued was unnecessary and unhelpful to the public discourse surrounding his death. She expressed her belief that the media's intention was simply to create headlines akin to 'BREAKING! Outrageous details from Navalny's autopsy revealed!', leading to predictable speculation and discussions by 'experts' on various programs.

Pevchich also criticized the media practice of seeking audience attention by publishing photographs or detailed descriptions concerning the condition of a murdered politician’s body. She emphasized that such forms of information dissemination cross ethical boundaries and diminish the dignity related to the grieving process. Pevchich's comments reflect a growing concern over the sensationalism prevalent in political reporting, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like death and injustice.

This controversy highlights the delicate balance between informing the public and maintaining responsible journalism. By making her statements public, Pevchich not only defends her husband’s legacy but also calls for a greater sense of ethical responsibility among journalists in handling sensitive information. The outcry against potential insensitivity in reporting on Navalny’s autopsy speaks to wider issues regarding the treatment of political figures in the media and the respect owed to their families during mourning periods.