[Editorial] In Response to the 'Oil Price Shock,' We Must Focus on Supporting People’s Livelihoods and Vulnerable Groups
The South Korean government has initiated plans for an additional budget to cope with the economic impact of high oil prices resulting from the US-Iran conflict, emphasizing the need for targeted support to vulnerable communities.
In response to the soaring oil prices triggered by the ongoing conflict between the US and Iran, the South Korean government has formalized plans to draft an additional budget, signaling a commitment to mitigate adverse economic impacts. President Lee Jae-myung's directive for budget review, followed by Finance Minister Gu Yoon-cheol's promises of comprehensive support through all available policy measures, highlights the urgency of the situation as the war's dynamics remain unpredictable. Given the significant time required for oil production to stabilize even if a quick end to hostilities is achieved, the government’s move toward supplementary budgeting appears necessary to safeguard the economy and public welfare.
The nation's fiscal law allows for supplementary budgets to be drafted in response to significant changes in domestic and external conditions such as war, large-scale disasters, or economic recessions. With South Korea's economy heavily reliant on oil imports—approximately 70% sourced from the Middle East—the country faces severe ramifications from the war, having already seen a 12% spike in gasoline and a 20% increase in diesel prices since the conflict began. Although international oil prices fluctuated from a peak of over $100 per barrel to around $80, they remain high compared to pre-war levels, posing a threat of inflation that could stifle any economic recovery efforts and disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and small businesses.
The proposed supplementary budget must be designed specifically to address the economic fallout of rising oil prices, targeted at supporting those most vulnerable to price hikes. Rather than implementing blanket cuts to fuel taxes—which could disproportionately benefit high-income households with greater energy consumption—the government is urged to focus on precision-targeted support for individuals and businesses most affected, such as subsidies for truck and delivery drivers, tax-free fuel for greenhouse farming, and energy vouchers for vulnerable groups. Funding options may be available through anticipated surplus revenue from corporate and securities transaction taxes, although any increase in public spending also poses a risk of exacerbating inflationary pressures.