On March 7, during a press conference, Senator Modeste Bahati, an ally of the presidency, expressed his opposition to any revision of the Congolese Constitution. His statement ignited a public debate as members of the presidential entourage frequently mention the need for constitutional amendments. However, on March 10, Bahati sought to clarify his position, saying that his comments were misunderstood and suggesting that discussions about constitutional changes should occur within the broader context of national unity.

Bahati emphasized that he believed in the necessity of changing mindsets before altering the Constitution itself. He asserted that he never explicitly opposed constitutional modifications but rather called for a debate on the issue as part of the Union sacrée de la Nation, a coalition meant to foster national unity. His attempt to clarify the situation indicates a tension between the government's ambitions for constitutional reform and the public's reaction to such changes.

The controversy surrounding Bahati's statements reflects the larger political landscape in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where discussions about governance, constitutional integrity, and national identity remain highly sensitive topics. As calls for constitutional changes grow stronger within the presidential camp, Bahati’s remarks and subsequent reassertion of his views highlight the complexities and potential divisions within the political arena regarding how to approach the future of Congolese governance and constitutional law.