Banks Request Larger Discounts on Penalties After Compensation for 'Hong Kong ELS'
Banks are lobbying for substantial reductions in penalties related to the flawed sales of investment products linked to the Hong Kong HSCEI index, citing over 1 trillion won in compensation already paid to investors.
The Financial Services Commission in South Korea is nearing a final decision on penalties concerning the flawed sales of equity-linked securities (ELS) associated with the Hong Kong HSCEI index, which led to substantial investor losses totaling over 4.6 trillion won. Banks argue that they have already compensated clients more than 1 trillion won and therefore require significant reductions in penalties to mitigate further financial strain. However, there is strong opposition emphasizing that any leniency must not undermine the protective intentions of the Financial Consumer Protection Act, which mandates punitive measures for consumer harm and aims to prevent future occurrences of such irregularities.
On November 11, the financial authorities indicated that the commission might finalize its sanctions at a regular meeting as soon as November 18, particularly against five banks including KB Kookmin, Shinhan, Hana, NH Nonghyup, and SC First Bank, which have been implicated in sales breaches of the Consumer Protection Act. The issue stems from these banks having sold related investment products without sufficiently explaining the risks involved, which contributed to severe capital losses as the underlying index plummeted in 2023 and 2024. The commission has seen fit to initiate sanction proceedings in light of the inadequate disclosures made during sales.
Previously, the Financial Supervisory Service had imposed fines totaling 1.4 trillion won on these banks, reduced from an initial estimate of 1.9 trillion won, citing proactive remedial measures as a reason for the decrease. Although banks maintain their efforts in compensating investors should warrant further reductions, the regulatory body insists that any adjustments to fines must encourage financial companies to continue improving their remedial actions, stressing that fines are ultimately directed to the national treasury rather than directly benefiting the victims. Consequently, the debate over penalty modifications appears central to ongoing tensions between regulatory agencies and financial institutions regarding accountability and consumer protection in the financial markets.