The article explores how the narratives surrounding the open conflict between Iran, Israel, and the United States are influenced not just by military calculations but also by moral frameworks. These moral interpretations allow the involved parties to justify continued military actions even when rational strategic assessments might advise against it. This complicates the understanding of conflict, as actions are often cloaked in a sense of moral duty rather than mere tactical advantage.

In the context of Iran, the author highlights two key elements: martydom and a certain form of messianic beliefs rooted in the figure of Mahdi. The historical memory of the martyrdom of Husayn in the Battle of Karbala is used to rally support and acceptance for casualties suffered in the conflict. This use of historical and religious narratives demonstrates how deeply entrenched beliefs can significantly influence modern military and political decisions.

Furthermore, the article suggests that this moralistic framing affects how both sides view concepts like ceasefires and diplomacy. A ceasefire is often seen as a betrayal, while the urgency of diplomatic efforts becomes overshadowed by what the author calls 'sacred time', emphasizing that these religiously tinged moral frameworks complicate pathways to peace.