On Tuesday, Minister Flávio Dino, a member of Brazil's Supreme Federal Court (STF), stated that the Court tends to make more correct decisions than incorrect ones, urging for a more balanced view of its work. Dino expressed concern that there is often a lack of moderation, prudence, and care in the assessments made about the Court's operations. His remarks came during the examination of a legal action against parliamentarians accused of misusing amendments, demonstrating the ongoing scrutiny and responsibilities that the STF faces.

While presiding over a session of the Court's First Panel, Dino specifically referenced a significant recent ruling that involved increasing transparency and traceability in the use of parliamentary amendments, which effectively annulled the controversial 'secret budget'. He deemed this decision a correct move by the STF, reflecting the institution's commitment to integrity and accountability in governmental processes. By pointing out this ruling, Dino aimed to bolster public confidence in the Court’s ability to make sound judicial decisions that benefit the nation.

Dino's comments come at a time when the STF is being closely observed for its role in upholding democratic norms and ensuring that lawmakers act within legal frameworks. As debates surrounding judicial independence and accountability intensify in Brazil, the notion that the STF predominantly gets it right serves to reassert its legitimacy and encourage more thoughtful discourse about its endeavors and verdicts. This reflection on the Court's function is crucial amid wider discussions about the separation of powers and the judiciary's role in the political landscape.