Miko Bergbom, a member of the Finns Party in Finland, expressed his agreement with the recent statements made by former leader of the Left Alliance, Suvi-Anne Siimes, concerning the pension benefits available to immigrants. Siimes had commented in an interview with Helsingin Sanomat that it is too easy for immigrants to receive pensions from Kela, the Finnish social insurance institution. According to Finnish law, immigrants become eligible for guaranteed and national pensions after residing in Finland for three years, which prompted a discussion about the implications of such policies on immigration and social welfare.

In his recent announcement, Bergbom emphasized that tightening the conditions for pension benefits could encourage younger immigrants to come to Finland for work. He pointed out that the current pension system was not designed to cope with a large influx of immigrants from third countries. Bergbom's alignment with Siimes suggests a growing consensus among some political factions in Finland about the perceived need for reform in policies relating to immigration and social benefits, reinforcing a narrative that prioritizes Finnish taxpayers and their contributions.

This statement has the potential to stir political debate in Finland, as discussions about immigration and social welfare are sensitive and polarizing issues. Bergbom's support for Siimes' viewpoint may resonate with those who share concerns about the sustainability of Finland's welfare system. However, it could also face opposition from those who advocate for the rights of immigrants and believe in maintaining inclusive social policies that do not discriminate based on nationality or immigration status.