The Lithuanian Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of former lawyer A. Škėma for influence peddling after reviewing his case on appeal. The court found the decisions made by both the first instance and appellate courts to be sound, with no significant errors in the application of law or procedural violations identified. Shkema's argument that the investigation should have only started based on a report of potential bribery was deemed unfounded.

The judges established that the information obtained during criminal intelligence, which involved the actions of Shkema as a lawyer of a suspect, was admissible in court. They underscored the importance of such intelligence actions as necessary to avoid mistakes and prevent unjust reputational damage to the involved parties, including the accused lawyer. This outcome supports the use of rigorous investigative methods in cases involving allegations of corruption within the legal profession.

The court's decision reflects a commitment to uphold the integrity of the judicial system and address corrupt practices among legal professionals, highlighting the balance between protecting victims' rights and the fair treatment of professionals. The confirmation of Shkema's conviction may influence future legal proceedings and the prosecution of similar cases involving corruption and influence peddling in Lithuania.