The article by Mirjam Pihlamägi addresses a common issue in writing: the preference for complex and convoluted sentence structures at the expense of clarity and conciseness. This tendency often emerges when discussing plans or actions, particularly in contexts where clarity of communication is crucial, such as in budgetary discussions or event descriptions. Despite the writer's intent to maintain a polite distance from the reader, overly complex sentences can instead confuse or frustrate the audience, obscuring the intended message.

Pihlamägi reflects on the implications of this writing style, suggesting that it can create a sense of detachment between the writer and the reader. The article highlights real-world examples such as reports about exhibitions or financial proposals that may need redesigning, underscoring the importance of straightforward communication in these discussions. It also touches on recent events like the disposal of livestock during the African swine fever crisis, illustrating the need for clarity in communicating such critical information to the public.

In conclusion, the author urges both writers and readers to consider whether their communication style mirrors real-life conversations. By advocating for simpler and more direct language, the article seeks to enhance understanding and engagement between writers and their audience, ultimately fostering healthier communication practices in various forms of written discourse.