Tarmo Miilits discusses the Ministry of the Interior's readiness to engage in public discussions regarding the use of drones for traffic monitoring. The ministry is currently evaluating the potential need for legislative changes to facilitate the operational deployment of drones by police for traffic violation observation. Until a definitive legal framework is established, police will refrain from utilizing drones for this purpose.

In argumentation, Miilits aligns with legal expert Carri Ginter, advocating for individual liberties and expressing concern over the implications of transitioning from a freedom-based society to a surveillance-centric one. Although he acknowledges the risks associated with surveillance technology, he articulates a belief that legitimate and transparent use of technological advancements, such as drones, does not necessarily equate to a surveillance society, provided that police actions are lawful and understood by citizens.

Finally, the Ministry of the Interior is open to discussing the implications of drone usage candidly, emphasizing that the police will not initiate the use of drones for traffic oversight until legislative factors are fully clarified. This cautious approach highlights the importance of balancing innovative technology deployment while preserving individual freedoms within Estonian society, reflecting a broader dialogue on the intersection of technology, law, and civil liberties.