The article discusses the debate surrounding a proposed constitutional reform in Italy, which is focused on establishing a separation of careers between judges and public prosecutors. It aims to refute six key points made by opponents of the reform, labeled as 'fake news'. The first claim, that judges will no longer be free and independent, is countered by emphasizing that the reform will align Italy with established democratic practices in many Western countries. Furthermore, it is asserted that the separation will safeguard judicial independence rather than encroach upon it.

The second point addressed is the allegation that the reform will make magistrates subject to political power. The article argues affirmatively that the reform is designed precisely to reduce political influence and improve the objectivity of the judicial process. By employing a lottery system for the appointment of officials within the judiciary, it seeks to minimize the risk of corruption and favoritism, making the process more transparent and reliable.

Lastly, the article tackles concerns about the efficacy of the judicial system post-reform, refuting claims that the reform would bring about incompetence or disrupt ongoing investigations, particularly regarding organized crime. It asserts that the reform aims to enhance judicial efficiency, ultimately benefiting citizens by fostering a more robust and impartial legal system. The narrative positions the reform as a progressive step in modernizing Italy’s judicial practices.