An editorial in Le Figaro by Philippe Geli examines President Donald Trump's unconventional military strategy in contrast to previous U.S. administrations, particularly regarding Iran. While past presidents adhered to the 'Powell Doctrine,' which emphasizes building international coalitions and ensuring public support before engaging in military action, Trump diverges from this approach. The editorial posits that despite decades of mixed results from the traditional strategy, Trump favors a more instinctive, deal-oriented perspective on war.

Geli notes that Trump's method did not involve a formal ultimatum to Tehran, the formation of an international coalition, or even the mobilization of ground forces, which are typical of earlier wartime strategies. This led to a military posture that lacks clarity in terms of objectives or clear exit strategies. Trump's reliance on his 'art of the deal' mentality suggests a more unpredictable and potentially volatile approach to international conflict.

The implications of this shift could redefine U.S. military engagement in the Middle East, suggesting a tendency for impulsive decision-making without the deliberated processes that characterized prior administrations. The potential consequences of such a strategy may impact U.S. relations with its allies and adversaries alike, making the geopolitical landscape increasingly uncertain.