In a revealing interview published in Il Giornale, Milan's appellate judge Anna Ferrari disclosed the existence of a group of judges, contrary to the official stance of the National Association of Magistrates (Anm), who support the upcoming constitutional reform being put to a referendum. This group, previously silent, represents a significant dissent within the judiciary in Milan, a city that has largely acted as a stronghold for the Anm's campaign against the reform. Ferrari openly declared her support for the reform, stating that her peers also sided with her, albeit anonymously due to fear of career repercussions.

The revelation is particularly notable as it highlights the internal divisions among judges in Italy, where the Anm has maintained a staunch opposition to the proposed reforms. The upcoming referendum poses a critical moment for judicial independence, and Ferrari's bold stance may encourage others to speak out or reconsider their positions. The tensions between personal beliefs and the collective stance of the Anm illustrate the complexities judges face in navigating their professional obligations against their individual convictions.

This issue raises questions not only about judicial independence but also about the broader implications for governance and legal frameworks in Italy. As judges grapple with the repercussions of voicing dissent, the outcome of the referendum could significantly reshape the landscape of Italian law and the power dynamics within the judiciary, further intensifying discussions around the autonomy of judicial figures in political matters.