In a surprising turn of events, Prime Minister Robert Fico announced that the Office for the Protection of Whistleblowers would continue to operate under the leadership of Zuzana Dlugošová, reversing earlier intentions to dismantle the office. This decision comes after the Constitutional Court suspended the law intending to abolish the office and replace it with a new entity appointed by the current government. There were expectations of a definitive ruling by the court regarding the constitutionality of the government's intended actions. However, Fico's sudden retreat indicates a change of strategy, fueled by external pressures.

The European Commission had threatened to withhold a significant portion of recovery plan funds due to concerns over the proposed restructuring of the whistleblower office, signaling that the Slovak government’s access to crucial financial support was at stake. This ultimatum may have prompted Fico to reconsider his earlier plans, highlighting the influence of EU funding on national governance decisions. The reversal raises questions about the stability of Fico's administration and its commitment to justice and democratic integrity.

Commentators have noted this development as a potential sign that Fico's authority may still be susceptible to external economic pressures, especially given his recent unpredictable rhetoric and policy proposals. While this decision is seen in a somewhat positive light amid an otherwise tumultuous political climate, observers remain cautious about the long-term implications for the rule of law and democracy in Slovakia under Fico's leadership.