During the ongoing trial of Marius Borg Høiby, psychiatrist Trond Heir responded to inquiries from Høiby’s defense attorney, Petar Sekulic. He addressed questions about typical and atypical reactions following violence and sexual assault, maintaining that human reactions can be unpredictable. This highlighted the complexities in understanding behavior post-trauma.

Meanwhile, the defense attorney Ellen Holager Andenæs confronted Heir about his use of the term 'dream prince' to describe a potential abuser. Heir clarified that his comments were made in a general context and were not specific to the case at hand. Nonetheless, this language choice has sparked concern and criticism, suggesting that the terminology used in such sensitive discussions should be handled with greater care.

The discussions in court reflect broader societal issues regarding the language surrounding abuse and victimhood. The incident brings attention to how professionals articulate their views and the subsequent implications those terms can have in legal settings, as well as their impact on victims' perceptions and experiences.