In a recent interview, the President of the Norwegian Parliament, who has Iranian roots, openly declared his support for Reza Pahlavi as the leading figure to emerge from a potential political transition in Iran. Pahlavi, the son of the last Shah, has been living in exile in the US since the 1979 revolution and has expressed a willingness to return should the current regime collapse. His name has been a rallying point for those desiring change in Iran, indicating a significant level of public support for his leadership among expatriates and political analysts.

Pahlavi has announced a plan for Iran’s future, which he claims to have developed alongside a team of experts, outlining a roadmap for a post-Islamic regime governance. However, this plan has faced criticism; some detractors label it as a blueprint for a new dictatorship influenced by neo-fascist ideals. This perspective has sparked controversy, reflecting the divided opinions on Pahlavi's potential role in Iran's political landscape.

Conversely, supporters like Sarah Gaulin, a Norwegian-Iranian writer and leader of the LIM network, argue that Pahlavi proposes a political framework intended to work with various opposition stakeholders for a democratic transition away from the Islamic Republic. This dichotomy in views illustrates the complexities surrounding Pahlavi's possible return and the broader implications for Iran's future governance, amidst ongoing discussions about the role of the diaspora in Iranian politics.