The recent introduction of legal graffiti in Prague 4 has sparked controversy among local residents, who have taken to social media to express their dissatisfaction by dubbing the colorful installations as 'expensive doodles.' Critics argue that the new artwork not only fails to enhance the aesthetic value of the area but also seems to be a misuse of public funds. Many feel that more thought could have gone into the artistic selections and their appropriateness to the neighborhood's character.

In response to the criticism, the local municipality has defended the initiative by emphasizing its affordability and the bright colors the artwork brings to the streets. Officials point out that the costs associated with the project are significantly lower than many traditional public art installations, which can often burden local budgets. They argue that the legal graffiti initiative represents a progressive step towards community engagement in the arts, providing a legal space for artists to express themselves without resorting to vandalism.

Despite the municipality's efforts to promote the benefits of the legal graffiti, the backlash from the community highlights an ongoing tension between public artworks and local sentiment. As cities around the world grapple with the inclusion of contemporary art forms in public spaces, this case in Prague 4 raises important questions about community values, appropriation of public resources, and the balance between creativity and public approval.