In Croatia, the leftist parties, including 'Možemo' and SDP, are advocating for a ban on social media for children under 15 years old in an effort to protect their mental health. However, these same groups are also pushing to lower the age for abortion, allowing minors to undergo the procedure without parental knowledge. This juxtaposition raises questions about the logic behind such policies, suggesting that minors may be considered too immature for social media platforms but mature enough to make significant life choices regarding abortion.

The article highlights past proposals from SDP to permit minors to have abortions without parental consent, drawing comparisons to Sweden, where similar laws have allegedly led to a rise in teenage pregnancies and abortions. Authoritative bodies worry that if such policies were implemented in Croatia, they could have detrimental effects, similar to Sweden's experience. Meanwhile, 'Možemo' advocates for constitutional protections for abortion rights, thus complicating the conversation about children's welfare and decision-making.

Ultimately, the article poses a critical question regarding the priorities of these political groups: it challenges the reader to consider whether social media use poses a greater risk to minors' mental health than the decision to have an abortion. This debate illustrates a complex intersection of ethics, adolescent health, and the responsibilities of parents versus the rights of minors in making substantial health-related decisions.